Friday, May 25, 2018

New York TImes exemplifies "Post-Truth Era" by Declaring War on Sandy Hook Truth


Jim Fetzer

[Editor's note: This blog was deleted--no doubt, in my opinion, by the man who calls himself "Lenny Pozner"--for calling The Times to account for the absurdity of its fake news coverage. I will republish it as often as necessary to cope with the Deep State.]

In the latest absurdity publish by The New York Times, which pretends to be "our nation's newspaper of record" but which has a record of publishing false accounts of every major "false flag" carried out by local, state and federal authorities--most recently, about Charlottesville, where The Times celebrated a Charolttesville Stunt Man, a Photoshopped Photo and a Crisis Actor (who made her debut in Sandy Hook), we now have the further--and to my mind, conclusive--demonstration that The Times has gone "all in" on behalf of "fake news" in its own "Post-Truth Era":

The profundity of the willful ignorance of The Times and its designated hitwoman, Elizabeth Williamson, can be measured by the facts of the matter with regard to their reporting and completely failure--which has to be deliberate--to contact the 13 most highly qualified experts on Sandy Hook, who have contributed to the book, NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2nd edition, 2016), including 6 (current or retired) Ph.D. college professors, among them James Tracy, Ph.D., Vivian Lee, Ph.D., Dr. Eowny, Ph.D., Nick Kollerstrom, Ph.D. and Sterling Harwood, J.D., Ph.D., and myself, McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Campus of the University of Minnesota, who brought these experts together for this purpose:


Can The TImes possibly be unaware that the first edition was banned by amazon.com within a month of its publication on 22 October 2015 after it had already sold nearly 500 copies and appeared destined to be "a best seller"? It had to be suppressed because it proves that the school was closed by 2008 and that there were no students there. We even found the FEMA manual for a two-day exercise, which explains why there were Port-a-Potties in place, pizza and bottled water was available at the Firehouse and so many were photographed wearing name tags on lanyards--all of which is standard for FEMA exercises, where the manual was published as Appendix A! Even Infowars.com covered the ban:


It was taken down 38 minutes later after having received 178 comments because it accurately gave photo IMAGE CREDIT: CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE. which was accurate because the Connecticut State Police were staging the event behind the scene, including furnishing an empty home to serve as the Lanza residence and refurbishing the school to serve as the stage. When amazon.com banned the book, I immediately released it to the public for free as a pdf, where anyone can download their own copy of the 1st edition (2015) for free. And I have made many videos and presentations on Sandy Hook in the years since, where YouTube has been doing its best to take them down, which Mike Adams has discussed in his recent study, "'The Most Dangerous Mind in America' interviewed about 'false flags' and extreme censorship". And if further proof were needed that The Times is blatantly lying to the American people, here's a blog I publish on 18 April 2018:
_______________

Wednesday, April 18, 2018


Sandy Hook: How we Know the Lawsuits against Alex Jones are Malicious


Jim Fetzer  

malicious prosecution =df a legal action brought by one against whom a civil suit or criminal proceeding has commenced without probable cause and for a purpose other than that of bringing the alleged offender to justice


A couple who claim to have lost their son, Noah Pozner, at the Sandy Hook shooting alleged to have taken place on 14 December 2012, and another purported parent, Neil Heslin, who claims to have lost his son, Jesse, on the same occasion, are suing Alex Jones, the national TV program host, for defamation on the ground that he has denied the shooting took place and that their children died as a consequence and thereby spread "vicious lies" about them. Since truth is an absolute defense against defamation and Sandy Hook was a drill where no students died, they appear to have no case.
In NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), I published research with a dozen other experts, including six (current or retired) Ph.D. college professors, demonstrating that the school, which was loaded with asbestos and other bio-hazards, had been abandoned by 2008. It was not an operating school; there were no students there. But it was used as the stage for a two-day FEMA exercise, with a rehearsal on the 13th, going LIVE on the 14th, where we even have the manual itself, published as Appendix A to the book, which you can download for free as a pdf by searching on its title.


Sorting out the images that were broadcast from Sandy Hook, they fell into a pattern: the sign, the Port-a-Potties, the pizza and bottled water at the firehouse, the name tags on lanyards and parents bringing children to the scene were from the day of the rehearsal, which was treated as a festive occasion. The following day, however, was striking for its failure to conform to the protocols that apply to an emergency: there was no surge of EMTs into the building; no string of ambulances to rush the little bodies to hospitals where they could be pronounced dead or alive; no Med-Evac chopper called.


In order to convince the pubic something urgent had taken place, Newtown Bee photographer Shannon Hicks took a photograph (upper image) that appeared to show a police woman escorting a string of children to safety. But, as the book documents, she also took a second photograph (lower) a few minutes earlier, in which you can see parents present with their arms folded and in no evident state of anxiety while the woman rearranges the kids to get "a better shot". In between Boy #1 and Boy #2, several women casually look on, which I have described as "lounging at the massacre".


Ch. 7 presents 50 photos furnishing an empty house to serve as "the Adam Lanza residence", but notice the dearth of photographs, paintings or other decorations on the walls. Ch. 8 presents another 50, this time of refurbishing the school to serve as the stage. The classic is Exhibit 26 (above), where a string of four windows of Classroom 10 can be seen above the roof of the SWAT Team (or Crime Scene) van, which are undamaged. They would be shot out after the event, which means it was taken before the purported shooting. Notice crime scene tape is up for a crime yet to be committed.


Exhibits 30, 41, 42 and 44 of Ch. 8 provide further confirmation, where Exhibit 44 (bottom left) shows the perps drilling inspecting the aluminum window frame to plan drilling holes to simulate gunshot trajectories. (Ask yourself: What else could they be doing?) As a former Marine Corps officer who supervised 15 DIs and 300 recruits going through the training cycle in San Diego, I can affirm that no one familiar with marksmanship would be taken in. The pink rods are 90 degrees to the panes and parallel to one another, which reflects a fantasy, not a reality. This was the blatant perpetration of a shooting hoax.


When it comes to the Pozners and the death of their alleged son, "Noah", Lenny no doubt regrets that he sent Kelley Watt a copy of a death certificate in response to her demands for proof that he even had a son or that his son had died, because it turned out to be a fabrication, with the bottom (darker) half of a real death certificate combined with the upper (lighter) portion of a fake, which has no file number and the wrong estimated time of death at 11 AM, when the shooting "officially" took place between 9:35 and 9:40.  If Lenny had lost a son at Sandy Hook, he could have sent her a real one.

 
Kelley also noticed a striking resemblance between "Noah Pozner" and his older step-brother, Michael Vabner. So six of us collaborated in the investigation of this issue, discovering that they had the same eyes and eyebrows, the same shape of their skulls and even the same ears. I asked Larry Rivera, who had done brilliant work exposing that the figure known as "the man in the doorway" of the Texas School Book Depository was indeed Lee Harvey Oswald, as Harold Weisberg and Jim Garrison, among others, had supposed, to create a gif for the purpose of superposition comparison:



So they fabricated the kids out of photographs of older kids when they were younger, which explains why the parents were not allowed to enter the school to observe the bodies of their dead children but instead identified them on the basis of photographs--because they were fictions who only existed in the form of photographs! Does anyone think that Lenny, for example, is unaware that the death certificate he sent to Kelley Watt was a fabrication or that his child, Noah, only existed in the form of photographs? But others upon whom those photos were based appear to be alive and well:


Wolfgang Halbig, with whom I traveled to Sandy Hook years ago to confront the Newtown School Board, has obtained a photograph of eight of the Sandy Hook girls--cute and perky, doing very wellindeed, from all appearances--juxtaposed with the images that were used to represent them as deceased. A crucial feature in planning this event was to evoke the emotions appropriate to the wanton slaughter of first-grade children, who are so young and innocent. But those who perpetrated this fraud--which instilled fear into the heart of every American parent--were anything but! And here's yet another:


When Megyn Kelly did her special confronting Alex Jones over Sandy Hook, they used a clip of Neil Heslin, who went off script by describing how he had held his dead son in his arms at the time, which contradicted the narrative that the children had been identified using photographs. So I knew that Neil Heslin had lost his way and improvised! Indeed, he brought this photo of him with his son when he testified to Congress, which provides its own indications of prevarication insofar as this should have been only six years later from the time of the photo, but he looks closer to sixteen years older.

We have perhaps 100 lines of proof that lead to the same conclusion: there was no shooting massacre. It was a FEMA drill presented as a REAL event to promote gun control! But there does appear to be a cause of action here in the form of apparent facts discovered through logical inquiry that would lead a reasonably intelligent and prudent person to believe that an accused person has committed a crime, thereby warranting his or her prosecution, or that a Cause of Action has accrued, justifying a civil lawsuit. But not by Lenny Pozner and Neil Haslin against Alex Jones, but by Alex Jones against them.   
_______________

Obviously, The Times has no more interest in the truth about Sandy Hook than it does about the truth about Charlottesville, where it continues to publish complete rubbish bearing no remote relationship to truth in regard to either. There are good reasons why they avoid contacting experts on Sandy Hook--they don't want to know the truthbut to perpetuate the illusion. Anyone with any lingering doubts about Sandy Hook can do them selves the favor of watching my "Sandy Hook Update: Tracy loses, Wolfgang wins. The Deep States Strikes Back!" But you won't find it on YouTube, which is aiding and abetting the suppression of truth arm-in-arm with our nation's "newspaper of record" in betraying the trust of the American people.

Sandy Hook Update: Tracy loses, Wolfgang wins. To watch, click here.

Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Campus of the University of Minnesota and co-editor of moonrockbooks.com

Thursday, May 24, 2018

Sandy Hook: Not only is "Noah Pozner" a fiction, but his father, "Lenny", is also a fake


Mona Alexis Pressley with Dan Cromer
Conspiracy Realists

Is "Lenny Pozner" another name for Reubin Vabner?

Since "Noah Pozner" was a fiction made up out of photos of Michael 
Vabner, why should it come as a surprise that "Lenny Pozner" 
could also be Reubin Vabner, Michael's father?

Our research on the Sandy Hook school shooting continues despite the abuse Leonard Pozner dishes out to concerned Americans.  Pozner is the true picture of a traitor that has sold out his fellow man.  He is a banker/financial consultant and a NWO shill that seems to have no remorse lying and stealing everyone’s donations. Not to mention the trauma our people in the U.S. have endured since 9/11. Oh I know it’s nothing like the Zionists say they went through during their years in the wilderness. Especially, since they are so much better than us and why Leonard Pozner thinks this is all ok to do. 

Lenny's fake "death certificate" for his purported son, Noah Pozner

He states on his website that he has answered questions and shown everyone Noah’s documents. He is the perfect sociopath gas lighting everyone who will go along and be fooled by him. He even sent Kelley Watt a death certificate for Noah that turned out to be a fabrication: the bottom half of a real death certificate with the top half of a fake. It had no file number and the wrong estimated time of death. Obviously, if he had lost a son at Sandy Hook, he would have been able to produce a real one rather than a fake. And we have other good reasons to question the existence of Noah Pozner himself:


Kelley Watt noticed that "Noah" looked like a young Michael Vabner
Lenny shames people for asking questions about problems with the official narrative. He never shows up to court because showing his face would mean he would be found out (explanation later), and he has numerous websites and ongoing battles to take down any Sandy Hook questions about the official story. The man is relentless.  He seems to have no remorse and goes a step further by abusing those he has already abused. And we now have good reasons to believe that, not only was "Noah" a fiction created out of photos of Michael Vabner as a child, but that his father, "Lenny", is a fiction himself.



Who is "Lenny Pozner"?


Lenny Panzer’s real name appears to be Reuben Vabner, the father of Danielle and Michael Vabner. where "Noah" was Michael when he was a child in the 1990’s. Do not let the difference in Reuben and Lenny's ears fool you: they are still lopsided in the same direction even though the tops are bigger on Lenny, which we take to be one of the means they faked to deny they are the same. Photo forensics demonstrates to anyone interested that Lenny’s ears were extended at the tips. His chin was fattened up as well, which you can also see in photo forensics. Take away the ear tips and the double chin and you have Reuben Vabner. The Vabner photo must have been taken over 10 years ago, so we are confident some weight gain has occurred as well:

                     
As you can observe in this close up photograph of "Lenny", his teeth are crooked like Vabner's. The parts of the image--the ear, eye, and double chin--were photoshopped and deliberately made blurry:

Here is a list of Vabner’s job’s to demonstrate he NWO shill here to help bring down the U.S.

The photo below (left) is a better image of "Lenny's" real ears as a match for Reubin's (right):

They created a twin for Noah to throw everyone off and the older sister was Danielle. They photoshopped Lenny to appear older in the pics from the 90’s to make them look more recent. Reuben was born in 1955 making him older then Lenny which makes more sense. It was obvious Lenny looks and actually is a lot older than 50 years of age.

Faking "Noah's" Photographs


Many of Noah Pozner’s photos appear to have been created from those of Michael Vabner, his alleged older step-brother, when he was younger, while others may have been from Veronique’s brother, Alexis Haller, since they also look very much alike. When looking at some of the pics it looks as though there more than one boy was used. That could explain the problems Alexis Haller and Pozner had the year after the “shooting”. 


Jim Fetzer asked Larry Rivera to perform a superposition to test the hypothesis that they are indeed one and the same, which produced the following confirmation We have established far beyond a reasonable doubt that "Noah" and "Michael" are the same person, since this proof demonstrates that no alternative hypothesis is reasonable

     
During a discussion about the column by Mike Adams, "'The Most Dangerous Mind in America", someone calling himself dson30 asked, "Who is the boy in the Spiderman video?" with "Lenny". We had already established that "Noah" was Michael Vabner, where the interesting question is not the identity of the boy, which we already knew, but of the man with him, his father, whose real name is not "Lenny Pozner" but Reubin Vabner.

[Editor's note: By far the most interesting comments on the discussion thread for Mike Adams' article, "'The Most Dangerous Mind in America' interviewed about false flags and extreme censorship" (6 May 2018) were those from someone using the handle, "dson30", whom I believe to be Reubin Vabner (aka "Lenny Pozner"). He seems to know too much about both of the boys and to be too eager to dismiss their identification. Here's one of his most interesting comments:


When I suggest the fellow at the lower right is "Noah" all grown up, he remarks, "If the guy on the right is Michael Vabner, why does that matter?", which would be ridiculous but for his contention that we have not shown "Noah" to be a fiction created out of photos of Michael when younger. He also claims that our superpositions "only show they have similarities", which he says they should have since they are half-brothers who share the same mother. His question about "Spiderman", by the way, is rather telling.

By asking who is in the photo of a little boy with the one we have identified until now as "Lenny Pozner", he thinks he has made the following argument: Since the little boy is with his father, Lenny Pozner, it makes no sense to suppose he is actually Michael Vabner. But when you realize that "Lenny Pozner" is a pseudonym for Reubin Vabner, it makes perfect sense to suppose that he is with his father, because his father is actually Reubin Vabner, even though we have known him by another name. There are lots of details here that further confirm my inference that dson30 is Reubin Vabner (aka Lenny Pozner).]
               

Faking "Noah's" Gravestone


It appears that the engraving on the Noah Pozner headstone was digitally added. Note the perspective of the engraving on Noah's headstone compared to an actual headstone. Noah's engraving (top) appears to have been digitally "stamped" onto the headstone compared to authentic engraving (bottom):

Notice, too, that the spacing is improper. Engraving is a very deliberate form of art that even approximates a science since exact placement has a premium for monuments designed to endure for centuries. But this one for NOAH SAMUEL is too far to the left and not completely horizontal.
 
Here are some examples illustrating how effortless it can be to fake images like these. Alas, when "Lenny" faked these--as we presume he was the one--he didn't do a very good job. As in case after case of these staged shootings, it's the details that give the game away: totally fake! Jim Fetzer isn't even Jewish!
 

Has Wolfgang been Played?

 

[Editor's note: On the basis of the creation of "Noah Pozner" using photos of Michael Vabner when he was younger, I have generalized to the conclusion that the photos of the kids were all generated that way--but not considering that6, in some cases, the parents may have used photos of themselves as children for this purpose. What Mona initiates here is a new line of Sandy Hook research, where, as occurs in the history of science, we proceed by the method of successive approximation in arriving at the truth, where our findings are tentative and fallible.] 

Wolfgang Halbig has been given a picture of the children all grown up. Now granted some of the children’s pics were of the older siblings but a majority are of the parents. Therefore, the teenagers in this pic are of the older siblings used in this hoax and the others may just been look-alikes or the parents at this age photoshopped in. 


The style of clothing back when the parents were children was unique as is in most generations.  When looking at the pics initially they just did not seem right for that reason.  Look at the style of the clothes in the pictures and ask yourself if it fits the time of 2012. It is highly doubtful. The clothes look like the style from the 70’s and judging from the parents ages that is about right.

  
Take a look at Soto and what she is wearing. Look at her badly photoshopped cut off fingers. Also, which one is the real school picture and why did two class pictures appear? We have been forced to consider the alternative hypothesis that many of the parents used photographs of themselves when they were children to avoid implicating their own children in such an elaborate scam.


Parents faking their "children"


Take a look at Lynn McDonnell with her “daughter” and the dress she is wearing. It is a style that was popular in the 70’s.  Her daughter has the same shaped face that McDonnell does and exact body frame. Children usually look like a combination of both parents but none of these children do. They look like one parent with the exception of the few times older siblings were used to create the victims at the school shooting. Another observation, Grace McDonnell appears much older than 6 in the picture on the right.


Next are the Parkers. Same as with the McDonnell’s Emilie was created out of Alyssa’s childhood pics. Also, a few days after the massacre I found the Parker's website. I explored the back page info and discovered the page had been changed a couple of days after the “shooting”. What had been changed on the website was the title, From Parker Four to Parker Family.
   
Alyssa and Alyssa Jr. picked up the habit of wrinkling their nose that never stopped in adulthood. Keep in the mind the clothing when looking at all these pictures.


Next, we have Mark Mattioli and his son, James. Again the style of clothes is from the 70’s and the ears are an identical match.

    
Jessica Rekos again looks exactly like Mom, and has on clothes from the 70’s in variety of pics. The parts in their hair are almost identical.
    

[Editor's note: A video that appears to show James Mattioli attending his own funeral seems to have been taken down by YouTube. (No surprise there!) Of course, it would mean that Mona and Dan don't have everything right about how they faked the kids, but provides as devastating a proof that Sandy Hook was an elaborate charade as one could possibly desire. We do have a video covering the funerals for both James and Jessica, which shows that funerals can be as easily faked as headstones.]

 

Faking the Administration


Even the teacher’s clothes were old fashioned for 2012.  Dawn Hochsprung did not exist in that school district. In fact she did not exist in any official records except the ones created for this drill. After close examination it appears Dawn Hochsprung is Mary Sherlock when she was young. The actual Principal in 2010 in the pics below was Barbara Gasperine. Both pics are incorrect since the school was closed but having two school Principals shows foul play.


   


Victoria Soto and Rachel Davino.  This is the same woman at a different age. Judging from the style of clothing they are both Soto’s mom when she was younger at two different ages. Funny, they changed the color of the dog to try to make her look like a different person. Mom still likes the green scarf.
 

[Editor's note: This case is also fascinating because the same woman who played Victoria Soto's mother in Sandy Hook also played Heather Heyer's mother in Charlottesville:

For more, see "FAKE NEWS: The New York Times celebrates a Charlottesville Stunt Man, a Shopped Photo and a Crisis Actor (who made her debut in Sandy Hook".]

  
The Lafferty gun grabber complaining in a tweet how she will never have her mother at her wedding while posting a picture of “her mother and sister” although the picture comes from a wedding picture of Sharon Epple (school administrator and Principal at Newtown Middle School) at her daughter’s wedding.

   

The last person in this blog is Anne Marie Murphy, (even though there are others in the Sandy Hook drill that needs further investigation) who was born on July 25, 1960.  The one Anne Marie Murphy who died at 52 years old is alive and now 57 years old teaching in MA.  Same birthday and same last name even though now she added the last name O’Reilly. Probably why they only printed blurred adult photos.

   

The family that stated she was their daughter does not match any documentation found on Ancerstory.com or other websites researched. After extensive research there was never any mention of a daughter Anne Marie Murphy in that family or birth records.


Concluding Reflections


Ask yourself if your loved one had just gotten violently killed would you be smiling like these people? 

 
Would you be smiling like these Sandy Hook parents had you just lost your child?

So, as with all government drills since Obama repealed the Smith-Mundt act of 1948, the people have become their own worst enemy. Americans have become a society of PARROTS that listen to a sociopathic government wanting to take every last ounce of our freedom away! If you think this is just a conspiracy theory then look around. Seriously, start listening to what your eyes see, and what your gut tells you? Everything the mainstream media reports, or someone with a big mouth says, is repeated by those that do no research. Most of the public has been spending their lives sleepwalking through history.

As a result, the people who are trying to expose the theft, fraud and continued trauma the American people suffer are being treated like the criminals, while the criminals are walking free and laughing all the way to the bank. The difficult work that Wolfgang Halbig, James Tracy, Dr. James Fetzer and many others have been doing for ungrateful Americans is unbelievable. One day, hopefully soon, Americans will turn off the TV, educate themselves, put their egos on the shelf, thank the selfless researchers for what they have done, and begin to help to resolve our nation's problems.

Mona Alexis Pressley has done brilliant work on Las Vegas and on Parkland, including tracking down the decedents on whom the obituaries in Las Vegas were based, who died in different states or on different dates or from different causes of death. Her research has been having a significant impact on understanding these "false flag" events, now also including Sandy Hook.

Dan Cromer has a background in IT, including expertise with both audio and video technology, which enabled him to confirm that the sound track from Las Vegas was too good to have been recorded at the scene but had to have been prerecorded, which was crucial in figuring out that Las Vegas was a movie! His primary contribution here was to the photographic record.


Wednesday, May 23, 2018

FACT CHECKERS GET IT WRONG: "March for Our Lives" permit WAS issued months in advance





No, the March For Our Lives demonstration was not prepared several months in advance of its date


Attendants of the 'March For Our Lives' demonstration hold signs on March 24, 2018 in Washington D.C. (Associated Press)
An Internet hoax has spread suggesting that the student-led demonstration March for Our Lives was planned months in advance to the actual event.
"Application for ‘March for Our Lives’ permit was made months before Parkland school shooting," read the headline on Fellowship of the Minds, a website that pushes conspiracy theories and religious ideas.
The mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School happened on Feb. 14. Since then, student survivors have made multiple media appearances and organized events promoting increased gun control. The national demonstration March For Our Lives occurred on March 24 in Washington.
The Mayor's Special Events Task Force requires a Letter of Intent at least 6 months in advance.

An application for a permit organized by Los Angeles-based television producer and co-executive director of the Women’s March Los Angeles Foundation, Deena Katz, was submitted on Feb. 20.
The article cites a correspondence with D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Scott C. Earhardt as to why the march may have been planned in advance. After an apparent source of Light on Conspiracies author Ole Dammegard contacted the police department regarding the permit, they received a response from Earhardt with the following message:
"In reference to your inquiry concerning the March for Our Lives Demonstration, here in the District of Columbia on March 24, 2018. MPD received a permit application several months prior to the actual event, and there was several months of planning for this large event."
However, when we contacted Officer Scott C. Earhardt, he said that he had mistakenly mixed up the annual D.C.-based March for Life rally that happened in January with the more recent March for Our Lives demonstration in the email.
How could there be any confusion when he cites the name of the march and its date?

Earhardt told PolitiFact that the story is not factual and that the permit for March for Our Lives was issued on March 13.
The misunderstanding between the two parties is likely to have increased confusion about the actual dates of when the permit was issued.
The screenshot of the email pictured in the article was credited to James Fetzer, a philosophy of science professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth who has promoted various conspiracy theories, including denying the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting, the Boston Marathon bombing and the Holocaust.
March for Our Lives was organized by the Parkland student survivors who began the Never Again movement to promote gun control. They partnered with the nonprofit organization Everytown for Gun Safety, founded by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
Even TIME was laying it out by 18 March, not enough time to organize a local bake sale.

Our ruling
A website pushing conspiracy theories claimed that the March For Our Lives permit was actually prepared months in advance.
We contacted the police officer referred to in the story who confirmed that the story is inaccurate and the permit was actually issued 11 days prior to the march.
We rate this story Pants on Fire.






UPDATE: For more on this crucial issue, see the following for substantiation:


"Officer Scott Earhardt and The Great 'March for Our Lives' Permit Boondoggle"


Officer Earhart has now offered FOUR DIFFERENT DATES for the permit having been issued.


Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Campus of the University of Minnesota and co-editor of moonrockbooks.com.